Saturday, April 2, 2016
Notan: A Creative Journey
The subject is Herefords grazing. One cow is looking out at the audience while the other three go about their business. Light coming from the left joins with shadows entering from the bottom and upper right to create the context within which we see these subjects in their environment. This interrelating of shadow and light creates the Notan of the scene.
Notan is a Japanese word meaning dark-light. Its original visual use was to create two-dimensional designs in black and white, the purest and most ancient we know being the yin yang symbol.
The Notan concept relating to visual thinking didn't enter western art until the 19th century when we believe it was introduced by Oriental art scholar, Ernest F. Fenollosa. In the early 1920s, American artist and teacher, Arthur Wesley Dow, a colleague of Fenollosa, was the first to apply Notan as a principle to Western art in his book, Composition. In this text he attempts to blend the Eastern concept of dark/light with the Western approach to negative/positive.
But Dow was handicapped by the mainstream trend of his time. Consequently, his efforts could not transcend that attitude beyond abstraction. With that era's concern being two-dimensional space rather than a translation of images within space, shadow as a construct of light was not a consideration. He took the idea of Notan as far as he could within the context of his time. We sometimes forget that during the Abstraction Expressionist era, shadow and light gave way to negative-positive shapes and value relationships.
What Dow did though was to introduce an idea that has become a valuable tool for realistic painters today. Even though he could not quite see the Notan construct in the natural world, subsequent artists have seen it clearly. Like any discovery, this one began with an insight that eventually became a working tool. Today we understand it as a principle with which we can comprehend shadow and light and one we can use to undergird the composing process.
For several decades, my personal work has been based on Notan. It is the basis for all our instructional videos. Our newest series digs deep into the Notan process, showing how we capture and create Notan, how we can find variations with in it and how we can creatively translate it into a painting. We hope you will find within these tutorials a breakthrough that will burst your creative stream wide open.
Saturday, March 26, 2016
The Tracing Debate
One of the hottest controversies in the painting world revolves around tracing projected photos onto the painting surface versus setting up a preliminary drawing free hand. Many painting teachers actually teach students to trace projections rather than showing them how to do a preliminary drawing. Students follow the practice innocently without realizing the limitations tracing puts on their work as well as their artistic growth.
Here are my thoughts about this practice:
- Tracing projections deceives the artist into thinking he/she is a more accomplished artist than they really are.
- Tracing denies the artist the exhilaration of making visual discoveries during the process of setting up the preliminary drawing as well as during the painting process..
- Tracing deceives the viewer into thinking the artist actually shaped the images.
- Tracing blocks opportunity for growth. It creates a dependency.
- Tracing inhibits making open-ended composing decisions.
- Tracing creates a fear of learning to draw.
- And most important, I think: tracing blocks individual expression.
I know of nothing more freeing than feeling confident about drawing. I suspect, though, that the practice of tracing began because of shaky drawing skills or at least an insecurity about drawing. But five decades of teaching drawing have proven to me that anybody who wants to can learn to draw. I've seen it happen again and again. And with the right teacher, it can be easy to learn and a joyful experience.
Labels:
Drawing,
Painting Process,
Tracing Projections
Saturday, March 19, 2016
Creating Your Style
(Note: Henceforth, content from each Composing & Drawing Tip Newsletter will appear here each Saturday morning. If you are subscribed to both, feel free to unsubscribe from one of them to prevent duplicates arriving via email.)
During the twenty-four years of our private art school, we held a student show at the end of each twelve-week session. Amid these, responses to student work that delighted me most were people asking how many teachers we had. Folks couldn't believe that the diversity of styles had emerged under the same teacher. Even the first quarter drawing students' work was already showing a unique style.
What I have noticed among all performers, whether artists or athletes, is that those who excel and reach greatness have a unique style, unlike any other. An example is evident in baseball pitchers. Craig Kimbrell, Tom Glavine and John Smoltz each have baffled one hitter after another, yet each stance and pitch is totally different from the other.
There are three kinds of styles: the imitated style, the evolved style and the hybrid style. The imitated style comes from the performer's intentional adapting a style of someone else. The evolved style is often called "self-taught" because it is one that comes naturally to a person without any conscious influence. The hybrid style mixes all that comes naturally mixed with influences by what one sees in or is taught by others. What we notice is that the style of our greatest performers is most often hybrid.
To the question of how does one find one's style, the real answer is by not trying. Those who do try eventually lose their natural expression to mechanical imitation, but those who focus their attention of developing the skills required for masterful performance will evolve their unique style without trying.
We are not to worry about whether our style gets influenced because whatever we identify with in another's skill set is inherently ours to begin with, otherwise we would not recognize it nor desire it. A skill is universal, it is how something gets done. It is not a talent, but an ability. In the long run, when our focus is on developing and practicing our skills, each of them will become our own. We will grow our own signature use of it. And out of that our style emerges.
Monday, March 14, 2016
An Inner Reveal
Today I'm sharing with you glimpse of my private world, the life of my sketchbooks. Over the seven decades of being an artist and teacher of art, I have filled dozens. Not all have survived. Two of my favorites were stolen, but none of that matters today. What's important is that these thousands of pages reflect moments of presence, moments when I explored with drawing, painting and writing reflections of my inner world.
A lot of the time, it's within the sketchbook that I work out ideas for a painting...
...or for teaching a lesson.
At other times, I explore with notans scenes I see around me. (You can sit in one spot and find dozens of paintings!)

Or I write notes to myself or find solutions to some dilemma. I often hide poetry within these pages.

I love baseball, so often I'll do gesture drawing of the players while I'm watching a game.

And I do many, many quick studies.

My sketchbooks are my home. They are where I live the most intimate moments of my art. While with them, there is no censorship, rather only the most authentic moments of my artistic life.
Friday, April 10, 2015
Dianne Is Doing Instructional Videos
If you enjoy these composing tutorials, you might enjoy the video lessons Dianne is doing. Check them out HERE. Also, check out her YouTube channel HERE.
Monday, October 14, 2013
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Breaking Out of Prison
One reason some artists avoid drawing the nude human figure is that, more than any other subject, every mark counts. Not only is the drawing's success dependent upon the artist's seeing things in the right place, it also demands the artist's confidence in wielding the drawing tool. A mark intended to define a shadow in the lower back can translate to a wrongly placed hip. A drag of the finger smudged with charcoal can result in the appearance of a misplaced nose. A slightly misaligned buttock can cause an onlooker to accuse the artist of imitating Picasso. So many things can go amiss that too many avoid the intimidation rather than face the challenge.
Avoiding intimidation never solved a single problem. Rather it imprisons us, causing us to place ourselves in a box where we feel safe and surround ourselves with excuses for being there. The only way to find freedom--to break down the walls of that box--is to enter into the place where the intimidating starts and act.
Being unsure of the drawing materials is quickly corrected by daily practice with the materials, becoming conscious that pencils, charcoal, conté or pen are tools, not mark makers. Doing studies from master artists' work by attempting to make your tool replicate the marks made by the master artist rather than trying to replicate the image will do wonders towards building your tool's vocabulary. The Michelangelo drawings I've included below are excellent ones from which to build this skill.
Avoiding intimidation never solved a single problem. Rather it imprisons us, causing us to place ourselves in a box where we feel safe and surround ourselves with excuses for being there. The only way to find freedom--to break down the walls of that box--is to enter into the place where the intimidating starts and act.
Being unsure of the drawing materials is quickly corrected by daily practice with the materials, becoming conscious that pencils, charcoal, conté or pen are tools, not mark makers. Doing studies from master artists' work by attempting to make your tool replicate the marks made by the master artist rather than trying to replicate the image will do wonders towards building your tool's vocabulary. The Michelangelo drawings I've included below are excellent ones from which to build this skill.
(Michelangelo drawings from The British Museum)
A combination of quick (gesture) and slow (contour) drawings--where your intent it following what your eye is seeing--is an excellent way to gain confidence drawing the figure itself. To begin with make your focus to capture only the movement--what the figure is doing, rather than the shape. That's the gesture. When doing the slower contour drawing, make your intent ONLY to follow your eye along the edge of each shape, inside and outside. Aim for only one thing at a time and above all, avoid trying to make your drawing look like the subject: keep your intent on the process. If it's gesture you're studying, then focus only on the movement; if it's contour, focus only on the edges of the shape. Just that and nothing else. It's all about controlling where your attention is.
![]() |
| Michelangelo gesture studies |
![]() |
| Michelangelo contour studies |
For exercises aimed to build your confidence, using photo references is a good way to go and, in spite of what the purists say, if it's helpful towards building your skills, then do it. If you don't have good photos, the website Pose Space has excellent photos created especially for artists to study from.
If the intimidation comes from either the drawing tool or the subject, I have just shown you a way to enter that place of intimidation and break through it. Once it's broken, you will have gained a freedom within which your drawing tool can go wherever you want it to go.
If the intimidation comes from either the drawing tool or the subject, I have just shown you a way to enter that place of intimidation and break through it. Once it's broken, you will have gained a freedom within which your drawing tool can go wherever you want it to go.
________________________________________________
Friday, January 25, 2013
Moving Forward Towards Freedom to Create
What we do reflects what we know as well as what we don't know. Knowledge is not static nor is it finite nor is it limited to study from what others have learned. Rather knowledge comes with freeing ourselves to learn: the freer our minds, the more open we are to discovering what there is to be learned.
In my college teaching days, I encountered a student who rebelled against taking the required drawing courses because, in his words, he already knew how to draw. His mind was blocked to what these courses might open up to him, to the depth and breadth the experience itself might provide for his artistic growth. He saw himself as possessing a singular skill with which he was satisfied, an attitude that imprisoned him from recognizing a possibility for further growth.
Similar attitudes prevail about composing paintings. Many artists develop their technical skills, but ignore composing skills, concluding that to focus on composition is to constrain their creativity. Such attitudes can block avenues within the creative process, causing the results of one's efforts to be contained within technical exploration alone, no matter how rich one's experiences might be.
...
In my college teaching days, I encountered a student who rebelled against taking the required drawing courses because, in his words, he already knew how to draw. His mind was blocked to what these courses might open up to him, to the depth and breadth the experience itself might provide for his artistic growth. He saw himself as possessing a singular skill with which he was satisfied, an attitude that imprisoned him from recognizing a possibility for further growth.
Similar attitudes prevail about composing paintings. Many artists develop their technical skills, but ignore composing skills, concluding that to focus on composition is to constrain their creativity. Such attitudes can block avenues within the creative process, causing the results of one's efforts to be contained within technical exploration alone, no matter how rich one's experiences might be.
...
Friday, May 11, 2012
In Praise of Gesture
Gesture drawing is our most direct tool for absorbing the essence of what we see. Simply defined a gesture drawing captures the movement the artist feels within the subject. It is the artist's rapid response to what the subject is doing, not how it appears.
Artists have been doing gesture drawing for centuries, but not until the early 20th century did it get its label, thanks to Kimon Nicolaides who left for us a comprehensive study program in his book, The Natural Way to Draw. (First published in 1941 and available free in a PDF file HERE.)
We are accustomed to contour drawing where the shapes' edges are meticulously followed, our more deliberate or cognitive approach. Gesture drawing does just the opposite, following the movement of the subject--a more intuitive approach. Nicolaides taught that both are necessary, each balancing the other.
Here's how he introduces the comparison:
Below, from Nicolaides' book, student drawings illustrate the power of gesture drawing to express what the subject is doing.
Three of our historical masters--Rembrandt, Leonardo and Michelangelo-- each left us volumes of drawings with copious gesture studies among them. Most often these would be quick studies, responding to something that caught their eye or towards an upcoming painting, but sometimes they would flesh out the gesture drawing with values, as Rembrandt does with his lion sketch.
At other times, we get to see the pure gesture itself, exampled in these Rembrandt studies of a baby nursing and "St Jerome Reading to a Lion".
And among the hundreds of Leonardo da Vinci's scientific and analytical drawings are many gesture drawings.
Even among the many beautifully formed drawings of Michelangelo are his gesture studies.
My favorite drawing of all times is Michelangelo's study of Madonna and Child where we see all the gestural lines and restatements along with his beginning to flesh out the form within the gesture drawing itself.
One of the most intriguing and exciting uses of gesture I've seen lately is that of artist Omar Rayyan. His paintings begin with a gesture drawing. (You may click on any of these to get a larger view.)
Within this drawing, Rayyan searches for the image and begins to develop it in paint.
He continues by refining the drawing and adding more paint as the piece develops.
This process continue until the piece finds its conclusion.
Gesture drawing is the closest thing to meditation an artist can experience: it is drawing without thought, responding with the senses without making judgments. It is the purest form of observation, taking the artist directly to the essence of the subject. It requires letting go and taking in the world as it is without any intention other than experiencing the subject. It is fun, relaxing and gives the artist a refreshed sense of renewal.
Artists have been doing gesture drawing for centuries, but not until the early 20th century did it get its label, thanks to Kimon Nicolaides who left for us a comprehensive study program in his book, The Natural Way to Draw. (First published in 1941 and available free in a PDF file HERE.)
We are accustomed to contour drawing where the shapes' edges are meticulously followed, our more deliberate or cognitive approach. Gesture drawing does just the opposite, following the movement of the subject--a more intuitive approach. Nicolaides taught that both are necessary, each balancing the other.
Here's how he introduces the comparison:
Below, from Nicolaides' book, student drawings illustrate the power of gesture drawing to express what the subject is doing.
Three of our historical masters--Rembrandt, Leonardo and Michelangelo-- each left us volumes of drawings with copious gesture studies among them. Most often these would be quick studies, responding to something that caught their eye or towards an upcoming painting, but sometimes they would flesh out the gesture drawing with values, as Rembrandt does with his lion sketch.
![]() |
| Rembrandt van Rijn "Lion Resting" c. 1650 |
![]() |
| Rembrandt van Rijn Study: Baby Nursing c.1635 |
![]() |
| Rembrandt van Rijn Study for St. Jerome Reading c. 1652 |
And among the hundreds of Leonardo da Vinci's scientific and analytical drawings are many gesture drawings.
![]() |
| Leonardo da Vinci Study for the Trivulzio Monument, c. 1508 |
![]() |
| Leonardo da Vincin Study for the Sforza Monument, c. 1488-9 |
Even among the many beautifully formed drawings of Michelangelo are his gesture studies.
![]() |
| Michelangelo Buonarroti Sketches for two separate projects c.1503 |
My favorite drawing of all times is Michelangelo's study of Madonna and Child where we see all the gestural lines and restatements along with his beginning to flesh out the form within the gesture drawing itself.
![]() |
| Michelangelo Buonarroti Madonna and Child Study c. 1525 |
Within this drawing, Rayyan searches for the image and begins to develop it in paint.
He continues by refining the drawing and adding more paint as the piece develops.
This process continue until the piece finds its conclusion.
Omar Rayyan "The Duel" Watercolor, 11x17 2011
___________________________________
Friday, May 4, 2012
Switching a Few Gears
Let's switch gears a bit and take a look at our work habits.
No matter our style of painting or our personality, there are ways to enable our painting process to move along more smoothly if we practice just four simple tips:
- Do quick idea studies before beginning to paint.
- Squint, not just once, but often throughout the process.
- From time to time, turn the piece upside down to check how the composition is working.
- Stand back--often.
Doing idea studies:
Call them scribbles, gesture drawings, concept drawings, preliminary sketches--the label doesn't matter. What does matter is that we get involved with the subject we've chosen before we begin to paint it, and that we explore a few composing options while we are becoming acquainted with the subject. It is surprising what we see once we make the first quick sketch.
Here is one of my idea studies and a painting that followed:
![]() |
| "Sautee Herefords" OIl on Canvas 2008 |
Here are a couple of idea studies Andrew Wyeth did for his painting, "Karl."
![]() |
| Andrew Wyeth Studies for "Karl" |
![]() |
| Andrew Wyeth "Karl" Egg Tempera |
As you can see, neither my little gesture drawing nor Wyeth's initial sketches depict our final compositions. Rather, they are both initial reactions to what each of us saw, a kind of private note-taking, getting to know the subject while mulling over how the composition might work.
Squinting:
Nine times out of ten, it's the details of the images that get between us a good composing. To squint at the subject, not just once, but often from beginning to end switches our attention to the structure of the whole thing, showing us how darks are connected, how lights flow from one area to another, how an array of colors fall into a simple value range.
![]() |
| Dianne Mize "A Look Back" Oil on Canvas |
Turning the painting upside-down:
Turning the painting on its head periodically during its development can tell us volumes about how the composition is working. Oddly, if it's working right side up, the composition will work upside-down.
Here's one Pat Weaver's paintings. Notice how her composition works both ways.
![]() |
| Pat Weaver "Racetrack" Watercolor |
Standing Back:
We can't really see how a painting is developing unless we put some distance between it and ourselves. Several times during the process, it's a good idea to stand back at least ten feet from the painting to see how the whole thing is coming together. The larger the painting, the further we need to stand back. Even very small works are more accurately seen from some distance.
With all the things we're giving attention to during the act of painting, it's easy to let slide the more simple things we can to do to keep check on what's going on. If you're not already practicing them, I recommend these four tips as keys to better composing and stronger painting.
__________________________________
Friday, April 27, 2012
Considering Economy
I've always been intrigued by how much can be said with so little when the saying of it is in the hands of a master. There are volumes contained in Emily Dickenson's simple lines, The soul selects its own society, Then shuts the door... or in the simple Rembrandt drawing of a woman sleeping. Ten simple words describing an entire mode of living; less than three dozen strokes expressing a human in restful sleep.
![]() |
| "A Woman Sleeping" Rembrandt van Rijn c.1655 |
Let’s dust off the economy principle: say more with less. It is easy for the artist to get caught up in multiple images and excessive details, but doing so can cause a feeling of disorganization or visual confusion. Sometimes the work is stronger because of what was left out rather than what was included: when we provide just enough information for the brain to become engaged, we can enable the viewer to participate, to mentally fill in what is not there.
Let's look at how economy is used by three artists from three different time periods.
Jan Vermeer, 17th c. Dutch painter, utilized economy by simplifying value range and shape patterns. Take a look at the simplicity of shapes and values in his Young Woman with a Water Pitcher.
![]() |
| Jan (Johannes) Vermeer Young Woman with a Water Pitcher c. 1660 |
In the close up below, we can see more clearly how each shape is defined by a simple light and a simple dark, uncluttered with details. Not only that, but if you squint you can see how the value areas are simplified: rather than a wide range of darks, all darks are closely related in value. The same is true with his lights. Squinting reveals a clear light/dark pattern of shapes.
![]() |
| John Singer Sargent A Parisian Beggar Girl c.1880 |
In this close up, the movement of brushstrokes is as evident as the shapes themselves, yet clean and simple enough not to overpower the shapes they are describing.
![]() |
| Carolyn Anderson Portrait of a Man c.2008 |
In the boxed areas, look at how the hair and both shoulders merge into the background: three examples of how adroitly Anderson simplifies with lost edges.
Even though their work spans more than three hundred years Vermeer, Sargent and Anderson are like-minded artists when it comes to knowing how to use economy, showing us how masters utilize the familiar old adage: less is more.
__________________________________
Friday, April 20, 2012
Creating Within an Intention: Rabatment
What do the sonnet, the waltz and a rabatment have in common?
Each is a form--a pattern for how parts of a creation will fall into place. Each is like a seed that will be an oak tree, an egg that will become a hawk, or a ball of clay that will be turned into a vase. The pattern is determined, but what gets created within that pattern has yet to evolve.
Another way to say it is that time-tested forms give an artist an opportunity to create within an intention. In painting, we select a subject, then we have the option to apply a form to help determine how we place the images. The form we choose is our intention for how we will communicate the subject we have chosen. The rabatment of the rectangle is a classic form for creating within an intention.
A rabatment is the square found on either end of a rectangle. For each horizontal rectangle, there is a right rabatment and a left rabatment. For each vertical, there is an upper rabatment and a lower rabatment
When choosing the rabatment as our intention for composing a painting, we have all sorts of creative options for making it work by assigning the inside and the outside of the rabatment each a distinctive role to play towards how the painting communicates.
One way to do this is to place the most active images within the rabatment itself, then insert an "onlooker" within the remainder of the rectangle, creating a structure that engages the viewer to identify with an image on the outside looking in. Here's how I did this in a 2007 watercolor of blue jays.
| Dianne Mize "Committee Meeting" Watercolor |
As you can see, I placed the two conversationalists within the left rabatment and the onlooker outside of it.
Another scheme is to place the major activity inside the rabatment, then to lead into it from the outside like Carla O'Connor has done in her painting, "Tatoos."
| Carla O'Connor "Tatoos" Watercolor |
Probably the most classic use of rabatment is to show a major theme inside the rabatment and minor theme on the outside, as illustrated by Robert Genn's painting, "Brittany Port."
![]() |
| Robert Genn "Brittany Port" Acrylic |
Wassily Kandinsky, a 20th century abstractionist, made a similar use of this plot in his painting, "Composition X."
![]() |
| Wassily Kandinsky "Composition X" Oil |
It's always refreshing when an artist takes a traditional form and uses it with an unexpected twist. Mary Whyte did this in her painting, "Passages," where she puts the major theme outside the rabatment, making the rabatment support the theme of the painting rather than the other way around.
![]() |
| Mary White "Passages" Watercolor |
Like the sonnet is to poetry and the waltz is to music, the rabatment in pictorial composition has endless possibilities for exploring ways we can enable our paintings to communicate.
****************************
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










































